Canon AT-1

I have used this camera a few times recently. It has an f1.4 lens attached and batteries inside, so when I have been in a rush and wanted a camera that just worked, I grabbed this one.

It was given to me by a friend. I was extremely happy to receive it, especially with the f1.4 lens attached. I do have the Canon A1 with the same lens so I don’t really need it…but how many cameras do I actually need??

I noticed it looked very similar to the AE1 I also have and then I read Canon’s Museum entry which states…

the AE-1 had a high price tag. There were also many users who still preferred manual metering. In response to these people, the AT-1 was developed. It had the same body as the AE-1.Ā 

https://global.canon/en/c-museum/product/film96.html

Well, that answers that then. The same body but with a needle-matching metering system. It first came out around 1976 and was for export only. It has an on/off switch, a battery check, self-timer (though my light indicator doesn’t work), a stop-down lever, and a flash terminal. That’s it, that’s all it needs.

Apart from the self-timer indicator, my example seemed to work perfectly. My first outing with it was to Liverpool for the ILFORD x LVP Photowalk. I loaded the camera with HP5 and enjoyed the day, developing the film in 510-pyro later. On the walk, I made a note that I thought the exposures were off, a little high. I compared the camera settings to the times given by my phone app. This was the first time I had used this camera and wasn’t sure if it worked at that point, so I switched between using the AT-1’s meter and manually setting the camera based on the phone app.

Here are most of the results.

As you can see, it worked well whether I used the internal metering system or not.

I finished the film off on a trip to Middleton Woods while I was playing with the pinhole camera I made.

What a super set-up and the f1.4 lens was perfect for the dull light in the woods. I love the results.

The next outing with the camera was to the Yayoi Kusama exhibition in Manchester. I loaded a roll of Cinestill, the f1.4 coming in handy again. I shot away, but when I got to the 24th exposure the camera would not wind on anymore. It felt like I had come to the end of the film, but I was sure it was a 36 exposure. I rewound the film and loaded it into an OM10 to see if it was a camera issue. It definitely was a 36 exposure so I fired it to 24 on f22 at 1/1000th with the lens cap on. The OM10 struggled to wind on the film at 22 exposures, but it did. It made me think it was a film issue. To be sure, I loaded another 36 exposure film into the AT-1. It stopped again at 24???? What was wrong with the camera??

I decided to sacrifice a 36-exposure film to see what was going on inside. Bye-bye 1994 Svema.

There was nothing wrong with it. So I surmise from my detective work:

  1. There was an issue with the Cinestill roll
  2. I had mislabeled the 36 roll I tried and it was actually a 24, hand-rolled so more than likely
  3. There was nothing wrong with the AT-1 and I had wasted the Svema šŸ™

I haven’t had the Cinestill developed yet, but given the issues I decided not to wait. If that film does come out I will make a photo post from the results.

As for this camera, I love it! Here is another review from someone else who loves it.

9 thoughts on “Canon AT-1

  1. Kenneth Bunting says:

    I love your Style of Composition Peggy particularly with shots of Architecture, B&W seems to really work with Architecture, I also note your colour Shots with Flora in them are very stand out, yes Lenses and Cameras help but if you have an eye for composition like you have the results are very Satisfying, cheers for a great review nice Camera. Thanks.

    1. Peggy says:

      Thank you so much, that is very kind of you to say. The two types of photos you mentioned are my favourite things to shoot.

  2. arhphotographic says:

    No doubt about it, the A series from Canon are a joy to use. That’s quite a complement from someone who has used Nikon for quite a number of years.
    Great images thank you for sharing
    Andrew

  3. Roger B. says:

    Very enjoyable b&w images – I echo what Kenneth Bunting said. Seeing that old gasworks tank is a surprise; I thought all those had been demolished years ago.

    If you think of the AT-1 as the follow-on to the FTb, you’ll fully understand its design rationale.

    1. Peggy says:

      Do you mean the roof or the meters on the wall? The latter are not connected I think, so just decorative. The former is not a gas tank, but a roof…though it does look similar. Zoning rules are quite strict in the uk and a gas tank would not be allowed near regular buildings. It is the central library in Liverpool, have a look at the satellite image.

      1. Roger B says:

        Fooled me! The roof looks like the 150 y/o “gasholders” here and there in London.

Comments are closed.